Qatar’s media empire is running full speed to destroy Sudan
Al Jazeera and its henchmen: made-up experts leading riots in Sudan
Sudan has become the main focus for Al Jazeera’s fake news
Sudanese protests have
become a newsworthy occurrence for most of the world media. However, these news
often resemble the whisper-down-the-lane game, where truthful information gets
modified or is only covered in a lopsided way. Al Jazeera stands out among such
information sources having developed a special system for producing this kind
of news.
In 2011, Middle East was
swept by a wave of protests subsequently called «the Arab spring». The
beautiful name didn’t necessarily mean a new happy life, though. Many countries
like Libya or Syria couldn’t control the intensity of the protests and a rather
deplorable fate awaited them: the overthrow of their leaders and the subsequent
decline. Countries such as Sudan have hold on until the very last.
Qatar, located closely to
the rebellious states, has been making plans on how to destroy some of their
leaders that it found undesirable. For that, the media tycoon Al Jazeera was
created – the major information weapon of the country. In 2011, this news
channel proved itself to be successful as a powerful propaganda tool. In their
publications, Al Jazeera’s journalists would criticize the military in Egypt,
Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria and many other politicians objectionable to
Qatar’s sheikhs. Sudan has been no exception to this.
In its stories, Al Jazeera
often uses an array of techniques – from simple fakes to people ready to only share
the kind of information that Qatar’s sheikhs find advantageous. Thus, following
the crackdown of the sit-in next to the General Staff building in Khartoum on
June 3, the Al-Jazeera+ channel issued a story with two
young people expressing their views on the incident. Let us look closely at
their personalities for if one gets to know the details of their biographies,
they are likely to find out a lot of interesting things.
The first person is Safa Babikir,
a young woman, presented in the video as a teacher. In plain English, she
emotionally describes the Sudanese events. She speaks as if she was present in the
epicenter of the riots. In reality, she is not linked to her country and has
been long living in Doha, the capital of Qatar.
Safa is employed at
Georgetown University based in Washington, but which has its branch in the
Qatari capital. The information on her can be found in the public domain – she
is mentioned on the web page of the Center
for International and Regional Studies.
It should be noted that we have
previously mentioned this university in our early publications as a place where symposiums by the Sudanese diaspora in the
United States are held. There, activists are instructed on how to work in
social media. This seems to be too much of a coincidence and an extremely
convenient way for the US to conduct their anti-Sudanese policy. Furthermore,
this is how American foreign policy operates, too, as well as its soft power
institutes promoted through non-profit organizations.
In the same time, the Center
where Safa is employed has conducted workshops on evaluation of the future of
Sudanese protests. At one of these, on February 6, a discussion on
the topic of “The future of peaceful democratic transition in Sudan” took
place. But the discussion of riots in this American university in Doha was far
from over. Only several days later, on February 15, a discussion
panel entitled “Sudan: popular revolution” was held at the venue. There were
banners with drawings of symbols of the Sudanese protest movement.
The second person from the video is Saad el-Assad. His
occupation is quite peculiar, since he is described in the Al-Jazeera’s story
as an «online activist». In
fact, he works for Qatar Debate, where he sets up round tables and
other events. According to official data, this platform develops and supports
open discussions and debates among Qatari students and young people as well as
around the Arab world as a whole.
It is worth pointing out that Qatar Debate belongs to
Qatar Foundation for Education, which is under complete control of the members
of the Qatar ruling monarch family. Qatar policy towards Sudan is lopsided and
has nothing to do with the well-being of the country in crisis and its people.
It is easy to imagine which frames are set by the supervisors of the platform
and what tasks they face when coming up with ideas of discussion topics for
youngsters.
Apart from common topics for young people debates,
there are other common points between Georgetown University and Qatar Foundation
for Education. In particular, it is known that the two has been collaborating with the supervision of the Qatari government, which
speaks a great deal about the activity of these «educational» institutions. Interestingly, the US
has repeatedly expressed its intention to close down the Doha campus since its activity proved contrary to
the Jesuit spirit of Georgetown University in Washington.
And this is not the only case of lopsided coverage of
the situation in Sudan. For instance, in another story by Al Jazeera on Sudanese protests the well-known to
us Eric Reeves, renowned for his engaged opinion and getting grants, presents
once again his allegedly expert view.
The same video features Yassmin Abdel-Magied, a
Sudanese woman, who has long ago left her home country. She left Soudan at the age of 18 months and has lived for a long while in
Australia. She is most famously known for having defended Sariah Law during a live program
on western TV.
As we can see, collaboration between Al Jazeera TV
channel an educational institutions in Qatar is going well. Young people raised
on their policies do right comments and pretend to be experts when they are not
such neither in status nor in professional activity. Pursuing such information
policy results in Qatari TV channel’s deceiving its viewers and destabilizing
the situation in Sudan.
Qatari sheikhs are concerned by the fact that Transitional Military
Council seems to be oriented towards Riyadh, Saudi capital and main financial
center, as well as towards the UAE center Abu Dhabi. Therefore, the question
whether their stance on Sudan changes once civil government is formed remains
open.
Comments
Post a Comment